QUOTE(rridgely @ Jun 30 2007, 12:54 PM)

Is that guy an expert in bomb making?
The London police who are trained in defusing bombs said that if the bombs had gone off it could have potentially killed more then 1700 people. I think I'm more inclined to believe the police.
Where I got the numbers:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/world/eu...amp;oref=slogin1,700 people is a lot of sq. feet. Doesn't that seem high to you? You would have to have one hell of a bomb to do that!
Look, if each person was standing directly next to each other, each person taking up 1 sq. foot, then we still have 1700 sq. feet of occupied space! A mile is 5280 feet, so we have a third of a sq. mile being occupied here! That's a HUGE bomb! Doesn't that make 1700 deaths seem a *bit* high? Not to mention that most people won't be in such close proximity to each other anyways....
I'm not doubting that there was some sort of danger, and I'm truly glad for the response, but I think this is a instance of things being blown out of proportion. To answer your question, I don't know what level of prowess this guy has when it comes to making bombs, but it appears that he knows enough to tear down the facade that people are making this out to be.
Something you might find really interesting:
QUOTE("Wikipedia")
The radius of total destruction [of the Hiroshima bombing] was about 1.6 km (1 mile), with resulting fires across 11.4 kmē (4.4 square miles).
Now you might reconsider what the NYT wrote.