Help - Search - Members
Full Version: tugzip vs. zipgenius
Piriform Community Forums > Computer Help and Discussion > Software
1984
which in your opinion is a better app? i currently use zipgenius, but am thinking about trying tugzip.

let me know. smile.gif
DennisD
Zipgenius user here.

Haven't felt the need to try anything else. I just like the way this program works.

Haven't really answered your question, just thought I'd put my two penneth worth in. smile.gif
Jawbax
I used to only use 7-zip. I think you basically need to ascertain what formats your compressed files will be. If memory serves ZipGenius caters for more formats than 7-zip.

I know this hardly adds any value, but I currently use PowerArchiver
Anthony A
Izarc is another good one and probably has the most formats of all them. If not the most it has many more than most others.
TwistedMetal
I have used them both and many zip programs for that matter. I really like ZipGenius and will be sticking with it for a long time.
Andavari
Between TugZip and ZipGenius I wouldn't choose either. tongue.gif

I would instead go with 7-Zip for superior compression with the 7z format using Solid Compression. Also I like the fact that 7-Zip includes a command-line ("CLI") version which I use in my backup batch file which automatically creates a backup 7z archive I burn to CD-RW.
Jawbax
QUOTE(Andavari @ Apr 12 2007, 03:40 AM) [snapback]68078[/snapback]
I would instead go with 7-Zip for superior compression with the 7z format using Solid Compression.


The problem with this is that the 7z format is not de facto currently, so even though I can personally play around with the 7z, with business related practices I have to use the good ol .zip format.
Tunerz
I would consider 7-zip and IZArc instead of the two. Also does IZArc have good 7z compression as 7-zip does?
Andavari
I know the 7z format isn't "defacto" however there's so many file archivers that can at the minimum extract a 7z archive.
QUOTE(Tunerz @ Apr 14 2007, 04:08 AM) [snapback]68308[/snapback]
I would consider 7-zip and IZArc instead of the two. Also does IZArc have good 7z compression as 7-zip does?

IZArc compresses with the 7z format just a few kb better than 7-Zip does. But if you're going to use the 7z format I think you're better off using 7-Zip itself since it can after all test it's own format for errors, etc., whereas some other archiving program may not be able to.
JohnDemolition
QUOTE(Jawbax @ Apr 14 2007, 02:37 AM) [snapback]68307[/snapback]
The problem with this is that the 7z format is not de facto currently, so even though I can personally play around with the 7z, with business related practices I have to use the good ol .zip format.

7-Zip's ZIP Compression engine does an incredible job of compressing files. it beats everything like WinZip, WinRAR, and etc...

however, i think that the best compression engine is in KZIP. The problem with KZIP is that it's only a command line program.
gamez
there is not really answers to the "1984"'s question laugh.gif
CTskifreak
I'm sitting here going...geez.... I only use the built in thing in WinXP Home and WinRAR. I never really use compression software.

AJ
Andavari
QUOTE(gamez @ May 28 2007, 01:52 PM) [snapback]72129[/snapback]
there is not really answers to the "1984"'s question laugh.gif

Getting a straight answer sometimes means one has to navigate a puzzle of "I like," and "I don't like." tongue.gif

QUOTE(GCNbball8 @ May 28 2007, 02:51 PM) [snapback]72135[/snapback]
I only use the built in thing in WinXP Home and WinRAR.

WinXP's built in zip support does zip files rather fast, however it's pathetically slow during decompression! wink.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.